Iran Local Histories
Fatemeh Faridi Majid; Javad HERAVI; Mohammad Bahramzadeh
Abstract
The importance of Olearius in the history of Iran is his travelogue and map of Iran, which was effective in drawing maps and writings about Iran in decades and centuries. Meanwhile, a little-known regional map of Gilan left by Olearius indicates the importance of this part of Iran in the Safavid period. ...
Read More
The importance of Olearius in the history of Iran is his travelogue and map of Iran, which was effective in drawing maps and writings about Iran in decades and centuries. Meanwhile, a little-known regional map of Gilan left by Olearius indicates the importance of this part of Iran in the Safavid period. In the situation in the sources of the Safavid era, there is ambiguity in applying the terms state and province to the regions of Iran, the state of Gilan has been drawn with high precision for the first time. What added to the value of the map was his personal observations and field research from local experts while passing through Gilan, which has doubled the validity of the map of Gilan as an authentic document of the historical geography of this region in the 17th century. The map (1656 AD) is the oldest and perhaps the first regional map of Gilan in modern European cartography that has corrected the previous information.
There are no maps left from the Safavid period, and therefore the concepts of the map have been matched with the most important geographical source of the Safavid era, Mokhtasar Al Mofid book, in order to determine the difference between the inside and outside view of a geographical place. Matching this information with the geography of Gilan, along with the nomenclature of this region, is one of the goals of the research with the help of the historical research method and library search. The findings show that the information of Olearius map is significantly more than the geographical text of the Mokhtasar Al Mofid in terms of quantity and details.
.
Javad HERAVI
Abstract
The unstable role of the Samanids over a century in Tabarestan was not without effect. The main element in the political and military domination of the Khorasan amirs in the province was the widespread unrest following the rise of the Alawites, the weakening of the Abbasid Caliphate, and especially the ...
Read More
The unstable role of the Samanids over a century in Tabarestan was not without effect. The main element in the political and military domination of the Khorasan amirs in the province was the widespread unrest following the rise of the Alawites, the weakening of the Abbasid Caliphate, and especially the conversion of Tabarestan into a refuge for sinful commanders and claimants. The military conquest of Tabarestan in this time can be actually in line with the policy and intentions of the Al-e Saman government. In such a storm of fire and blood, the sword of a Dailamid’s skirmishers in the boiling furnace of Tabarestan events, instigated and devised by the Samanids, undoubtedly laid the foundation of the dialectic governments, not only the fate of Iran; Rather, it will transform the political and military life of Islamic lands and the caliphate. The result was that Tabarestan, which itself did not have the requisite integrity to establish a stable government at the beginning of the fourth century AH, was subject to political stability by the end of the fourth century. The research method in this paper is descriptive-analytical and based on references to sources and references
